more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 21692

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / L. Paradox / 6. Paradoxes in Language / a. The Liar paradox ]

Full Idea

If we supplant the sentence 'this sentence is false' with one saying what it refers to, we get '"this sentence is false" is false'. But then the whole outside sentence attributes falsity no longer to itself but to something else, so there is no paradox.

Gist of Idea

If we write it as '"this sentence is false" is false', there is no paradox

Source

Willard Quine (The Ways of Paradox [1961], p.07)

Book Ref

Quine,Willard: 'Ways of Paradox and other essays' [Harvard 1976], p.7


A Reaction

Quine is pointing us towards type theory and meta-languages to solve the problem. We now have the Revenge Liar, and the problem has not been fully settled.